More Bad Science? ~ at Runboard.com
Community logo

Click logo for main page.



You know, the features on this board could make it one of the best political forums on the web. All it needs is you!

......Welcome to the pit of Internet oblivion!.........I'm still kicken, but slower than I used to!
CONSERVATIVE'S Comment Board
 Science Forum
  More Bad Science?
Support
Search

runboard.com       Register for a free global account (learn about it) | Log in: (), globally (lost password?)

 
CONSERVATIVE
Head Administrator
Global user

Registered: 05-2003
Location: Behind the keyboard of RIGHT!
Posts: 1067
Avatar
Reply | Quote
posticon More Bad Science?


The story below just sounds to me like more BAD SCIENCE. It reminds me of the Nazis using skull measurements to say that Jewish people were inferior, or the KKK using skulls to say Blacks were subhuman. Somehow I thought science had gotten beyond this sort of thing. I guess not. Nephrology is in, and we're back to reading head bumps again I guess.

It's just as crazy to think that Neanderthals didn't interbreed with more modern man too, unless human nature has changed since then which is unbelievable unless you call yourself a "scientist". This is just one more example of why science can not be trusted.

"Conservative" emoticon

Neanderthal was not your grandfather


WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- You may think your grandparents act like Neanderthals, but U.S. researchers said on Monday they had strong evidence that modern humans are not descended from them.

A computer analysis of the skulls of modern humans, Neanderthals, monkeys and apes shows that we are substantially different, physically, from those early humans.

Harvati and colleagues combined modern computer technology and the tried-and-true method of determining species that uses physical comparisons.

They examined the skulls of modern humans and Neanderthals and 11 existing species of non-human primates including chimpanzees, gorillas and baboons.

They measured 15 standard skull and face landmarks and used 3D analysis to superimpose each one on the other.

"From these data, we were able to determine how much variation living primate species generally accommodate, as well as measure how different two primate species that are closely related can be," Harvati said in a statement.

Their computer analysis showed that the differences measured between modern humans and Neanderthals were significantly greater than those found between subspecies of living monkeys and apes.

Complete story can be found HERE!


---
I don't care if you're Liberal or Conservative or what you are-just that you care about something besides yourself! No ~ actually I think I do.
1/28/2004, 3:17 pm Send Email to CONSERVATIVE   Send PM to CONSERVATIVE
 


Add a reply




Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/19/2008, 1:07 pm


~ Interesting Blogs ~

Since the pages I used to list here have not been updated in a while or have been removed, I am also removing their links. Let me know if you still want to be listed here. Thanks.


This Forum is actively seeking membership. If you dropped in here to see what was happening, please think about becoming a member and joining our discussions. We need a variety of people, with various unique views on life to make it interesting, not just conservatives, and certainly not that brand of bully.--(see, I get tired of being about the only one here)

So please, why not join and give it a try?





Some parts of this page © 2003~2008, by CONSERVATIVE'S Comment Page™. Other work appearing here © by their respective owners.