CONSERVATIVE
Head Administrator
Global user
Registered: 05-2003
Location: Behind the keyboard of RIGHT!
Posts: 1067
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Neocons? Or Neolibs?
One of the easiest ways to tell a liberal in today's news and commentary is if you see them using the term “Neoconservative” or “Neocon” for short. It looks like the herding instinct has run amuck with all the liberals trying to build something off each other's words and using the same words. If it weren't for these so-called and self-named “free thinkers” our country might be devoid of lemmings entirely.
So what is a Neocon and why is it used by so many of today's writers and speakers? I mean you can hardly visit a website, or read a newspaper, or pick up a magazine where a liberal has been given a voice and not find the word Neocon constantly repeated on it somewhere. It is their rallying point. Their buzzword.
The term “Neoconservative” means exactly this: New Conservative. Some say it's roots are founded in the Jewish movement towards Israel, but that is hardly what the term describes now. What a misnomer the word is anyway. Only a liberal could have come up with it as a descriptive term and think its usage is somehow enlightening, intelligent, and in vogue.
If you listen or look very closely at today's version of lib-speak, you will see an almost total lack of original thought, but a constantly repeated message that was picked up somewhere along the way and refiltered to present their current version of whatever "brand new" liberal idea is on today's small mind. The constant use of Neocon boils down to nothing more than continued blossoming ignorance. The very same people will also rant and rave that the very idea of conservatism is a steadfast resistance to new ideas and thoughts. On that point they are probably right. So how can a group that holds traditional values and ideals be somehow new? The answer is simple. We aren't.
We aren't so easily fooled. Conservatives have a tendency to reject many new ideas that have never been tested or that go against the very basics of human nature. Take the liberal idea that to stop terrorism we have to look at the root causes of this blight. The concept might work if we weren't hampered by the Political Correctness that the libs seem to have gotten institutionalized in recent years and looked at the truth. Don't forget they are lemmings constantly repeating the same lib-speak over and over making themselves believe it. Like all propaganda machines, given enough time, the lies will take hold. The simpler the mind, the more easily fooled.
You have probably seen where liberals claim the number one reason for terrorism is abject poverty. This of course is nothing but another liberal lie passed out repeatedly by a bunch of ignorant fools who can no longer discern the truth when it's right in front of them. And of course they all flock to the call "KNOWING" the same thing.
Osama bin-Laden, the leader of Al-Qaeda is a millionaire. He was raised in one of Saudi Arabia's richest oil and construction families. Also the terrorists involved with 9-11 were mostly college educated people who could afford to go to school abroad. So are many of the suicide bombers plaguing Israel. These terrorists hardly sound like poverty stricken idealists fighting for their personal rights and freedoms. Here is another example: Look at the liberal's own political candidates, Kerry and Edwards. People who claim to be for the middle class and poor but live like wealthy kings. Only an idiot could not see the truth. Too bad there are so many of these same idiots in our country today.
How about if a new term with Neo in the prefix is going to be formed and used in everyday language, why shouldn't it be the term “Neolib”? Certainly the liberal of today has the ability to see the world through Stepford Wife-like originality and these are not the same liberals of 30 years ago. This is a NEW breed of people that have seen the government as the solution to every social problem and personal ill. The old name for people who wanted the government to control every aspect of their lives used to be communist. What difference is there between Neolibs and communists/socialists today? Not much.
They want corporations taxed to death so we can all pay higher prices or do without. They want the rich to be taxed and the poor given too until the playing field is leveled. They see the great solution in government education as the cure-all for about everything from illegitimate pregnancies to stopping crime. They want us all equal, without regard to people's differences and abilities. They want government to control all aspects of our lives. They want us safe. They want us brought down to where no other country will be jealous of our success and we will have no more than they do. They are Neolibs, they are the NEW breed, and they are truly blind.
© 2004, by "Conservative"
---  |
|
7/9/2004, 1:27 pm
|
Send Email to CONSERVATIVE
Send PM to CONSERVATIVE
|
CONSERVATIVE
Head Administrator
Global user
Registered: 05-2003
Location: Behind the keyboard of RIGHT!
Posts: 1067
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Neocons? Or Neolibs?
Hey Wesley, welcome to the board here! Got a request though. You might like your avatar but I don't really appreciate having my visitors looking at a tail to read your posts. Sorry.
If you want to participate in this board, how about joining it locally so your runboard-wide avatar doesn't show here? That would work for both of us without too much trouble on your part, or mine.
I appreciate desenting opinions, I really do, but since this place promotes religion, morals, and basic family values, I find the tail shot sort of conflictive if you can understand that point of view.
You are also free to voice your opinion on disliking the Catholic religion's views, but I'm not real interested in having an anti-Catholic site listed below your name as was done in your other post. I think that and your avatar might conflict with Runboard rules by the way you had to have seen when you joined their system, and I don't really want my board shut down because of your posts.
I will be deleting your post(s) because of the avatar. You might also try reading my rules posted here that aren't too hard to follow before you keep posting.
Thanks and welcome again,
"Conservative" 
(and there are no real neo-cons--it's a hyped up word used to put people down--evil is nothing new either, so neo-libs are just a new way of presenting the same matter in a new light) That's my opinion and I'm stickin to it!
Last edited by CONSERVATIVE, 2/3/2005, 6:01 pm
--- |
|
2/3/2005, 5:58 pm
|
Send Email to CONSERVATIVE
Send PM to CONSERVATIVE
|
Add a reply
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 11/19/2008, 1:36 pm
|
|
|
(Original post removed due to avatar conflict)