Page: 1 2
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1520
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
 Creation -vs- Evolution
The first thing to establish, is what is the scientific method?
Three steps:
1. Idea (hypothesis or theory) that predicts something in nature.
2. Conduct experiments and observe whether the predictions are valid.
3. Based upon your observations, state your conclusions.
The most important part of science is OBSERVATION.
And keep in mind, "time" is not a scientific answer. Evolutionists like to say that "it happened over time" to end the discussion. That is nothing but a blind faith guess.
There is nothing scientific about it.
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
11/8/2007, 12:51 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1520
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
Here's a question that we can answer: "I've heard that the DNA of people and chimpanzees are 99% similar, doesn't that prove we evolved from a common ancestor?
This is very misleading. First of all, apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes, and humans have 23. That is a significant difference. Also, the entire DNA sequence of chimps has not been mapped. But studies have shown that many sequences of human DNA are at least 98.5% similar to sequences in chimps. This is to be expected. Humans eat what chimps eat, breath the same air etc., thus many of our proteins whould be similar. But, since 3.2 billion base pairs make up human DNA, a 1.5% difference means there are still 48 million differences between man and chimp!
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
11/8/2007, 2:53 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
OperaGhost815
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 05-2006
Posts: 9
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
Wow! I hope I can remember that for future reference.
|
|
11/8/2007, 10:22 pm
|
Send PM to OperaGhost815
|
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1520
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
Someone might ask, "But couldn't people have evolved by a step by step process over time?
Think back to that car in the prior post and suppose it had everything except pisons, would it work? No, it would not function. A car is a system of components, it needs 10,000 parts to work; but it needs just one part not to work for it to be useless.
People also have thousands of components, which all must be working or else you die. Think how this relates to evolution. What evolved first? Hearts? Brains? Lungs? Livers? Kidneys? Stomachs? How about the stomach acids or the lining that prevents it from eating up your entire body? All of these must function immediately!
Believing the Garden of Eden account of "instant humans" may take some faith, but it requires much more faith to believe evolution made humans.
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
11/8/2007, 10:40 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1520
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
Here are three laws of science that everyone should know:
1. The First Law of Thermodynamics
2. The Second Law of Thermodynamics
3. The Law of Biogenesis.
They all falsify atheism.
The First Law of Thermodynamics states matter and energy is neither created nor destroyed. Atheists believe that everything came from nothing, but natural processes, but that would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics.
And according to The Second Law of Thermodynamics, the universe could not be eternal, either. This law teaches that matter and energy in a closed system (like the Universe) are subject to entropy, matter and energy "decay"- becomes less available, can no longer do work - over time.
Thus, if something decays over time, it cannot be eternal. The universe is not eternal and when it began it could not have come from nothing, thus the best explanation is it had a supernatrual beginning.
Now, the Earth isn't a closed system, however the Universe is the system under study, not the Earth.
The Law of Biogenesis and the Cell Theory are universally accepted, they teach that life only comes from life. Atheists think life came from non-life by natural processes, thus believing in the long disproved "spontaneous generation."
In the 1800's, evolutionist Ernst Haekel taught that a living cell could arise by the comination of a few chemicals. Today we know that the simplest living single celled organism has 100,000,000,000,000,000 atoms! The "simplest cell" has more information than billions of computers, there is no "simple cell."
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
11/9/2007, 10:49 am
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Free04
Global user
Registered: 04-2006
Posts: 306
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
These are great posts Mel. Simple and so easy to understand.
Amazing how science actually proves the existence of God, but some are just to blind to see. I think the greatest hymn ever written talks about the blind thing. (Amazing Grace) Thanks for posting this. 
|
|
11/9/2007, 3:28 pm
|
Send Email to Free04
Send PM to Free04
|
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1520
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
Yeah, I got a print out from a guy on the street. The website has more great articles, too. (There's a link in my fourth post or so.)
I found it to be well written and understandable as well. They just won't give this information in schools. Obviously, because it makes more sense that the garbage they're peddling.
I'll type up more of it and post as I get the chance.
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
11/9/2007, 3:36 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1520
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation -vs- Evolution
Be aware that the word "evolution" means change. Students are taught that people are taller than they used to be (true) but that does not mean you have bacteria ancestors; you can breed dogs, but they're still dogs and it does not mean dogs have bacteria ancestors. Dog breeding is "micro-evolution." Believing dogs have bacteria ancestors is MACROevolution.
Evolutionists confuse the issue of Natural Selection with Macro evolution. Natrual Selection occurs, but it is not evidence for the Theory of evolution. Natural Selection rewards good traits in a population and punishes bad traits in a population, it doesn't create a new population.
Darwin got excited about different types of beaks on birds in the Galapogos Islands. But they were still the same species of birds, they just had different traits. If you have a good trait, you live, and your genes get passed on, if you have a bad trait, you die and your genes are not passed on. Natural Selection is microevolution not macroevolution.
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
11/12/2007, 10:17 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Add a reply
Page: 1 2
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 12/4/2008, 1:33 am
|
|
|
