Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1252
Karma: 22 (+25/-3)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Creation vs Evolution - A Scientific Perspective
Decide for yourself, just be informed.
-----------------------------------------
Question: How did life begin?
Evolution says, "Billions of years ago, life began from nonliving things by natural process."
Creation says, "Life cannot come from nonlife by natural process. In nature, life only comes from life. Life's origin was supernatural."
Scientific Fact: The Law of Biogenesis states life only comes from life. The Cell Theory states living cells only come from living cells. The Law of Science contradicts Evolution and supports Creation.
-----------------------------------------
Question: How did the universe originate?
Evolution says, "Billions of years ago, the universe (matter and energy) originated from nothing by natural process."
Creation says, "Matter and energy cannot originate from nothing by natural processes, it's origin was supernatural."
Scientific Fact: The First Law of Thermodynamics states matter and energy is neither created nor destroyed. This Law of Science contradicts Evolution and supports Creation.
-----------------------------------------
Question: How did the universeget to be how it is today?
Evolution says, "The Big Bang. All matter and energy was originally in a tiny clump and it expanded. The universe began as chaos and over time became orderly."
Creation says, "The universe was created orderly. Our orderly solar system is the result of design, not chance and chaos over time."
Scientific Fact: The Second Law of Thermodynamics states systems go from order to chaos (which Creation teaches) and not from chaos to order (which Evolution teaches). This Law of Science contradicts Evolution and supports Creation.
-----------------------------------------
Question: Do people have bacteria as ancestors?
Evolution says, "Yes, the first life was bacteria and after many mutations over billions of years the result was people."
Creation says, "Absolutely not. Bacteria can only make bacteria and people can only come from people."
Scientific Fact: Creation is supported by genetics and biochemistry. A simple knowledge of DNA, and what it does, shows that if bacteria is mutated, all you will get is mutated bacteria or dead bacteria.
-----------------------------------------
Question: But offspring can be different from their parents, isn't that evidence for Evolution?
Evolution says, "Yes, an accumulation of these small changes over billions of years accounts for Evolution."
Creation says, "Yes, offspring change, but within limits. Traits may change, but dogs can only make dogs."
Scientific Fact: Artifical breeding has shown there are limits to changes in animals. You can breed dogs to get faster dogs, but they are still, and always will be dogs.
-----------------------------------------
Question: If Evolution is true, where is the fossil evidence?
Evolutionist Dr. Mark Ridley says, "No real evolutionist uses the fossil record as evidence in favor of the theory of evolution." - New Scientist, 6-25-81, p 831
Creation says, "The fossil record does not show evidence of "missing links" because they never existed."
Scientific Fact: Evolutionists admit the fossil record does not support Evolution. If bacteria to blue whale evolution is true, there should be thousands of fossils of the animals that were missing links, yet they do not exist.
-----------------------------------------
Question: If Evolution is true, where is the living evidence?
Evolution says, "Since Evolution takes such a long time to see real changes, we do not expect to see living evidence."
Creation says, "There is no living evidence of bacteria to blue whale evolution because it never happened."
If the theory of Evolution is true, there had to have been billions of missing links. Where are they? Why aren't they alive today? 
---
I know who saved my soul and I want this world to know, that I was once blind, once lost, Now I'm blood bought, reconciled to God by the blood He shed on the cross. -Eternal M.o.G.
|
|
9/20/2007, 10:37 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Staybrite
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1699
Karma: 70 (+70/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation vs Evolution - A Scientific Perspective
Eventually people will see evolution for what it truly is, just a flavor of the month explanation that doesnt work.
For example, 60 years ago all respected scientist believed that the universe had always existed. The basis for this belief was the first law of thermodynamics.
What made so many of them abandond that priciple in favor of evolution? Because all the fashionable people bought into it, and made it "the trend".
If you want to abandon hundreds of years of scientific research and gathered evidence, go ahead a believe in evolution. But in 500 years you will be laughed at like all the people who believed the earth was flat, and the sun revolved around us.
---
Peace, that brief period in history when everyone stops to reload.
|
|
9/21/2007, 1:57 pm
|
Send Email to Staybrite
Send PM to Staybrite
|
Order ofMelchizedek
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Here I am
Posts: 1252
Karma: 22 (+25/-3)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation vs Evolution - A Scientific Perspective
So you believe in Micro-evolution (adaptation, which has been proven) but not Macro-evolution (changing from one species to another). Right?
No problem, ramble away. We do this often around here. 
---
Carry me, I'm just a dead man lying on the carpet, can't find a heartbeat,
Make me breathe, I wanna be a new man, tired of the old one, out with the old plan - JoC
|
|
2/15/2008, 11:45 pm
|
Send PM to Order ofMelchizedek
|
Moriah Cosmos
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 02-2008
Posts: 62
Karma: 5 (+5/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation vs Evolution - A Scientific Perspective
yes it is proven that species can make adaptations or it may just be that a species has better nutrition (humans) and can sustain life easier. I have yet to see where an entire species has made such adaptations to change into a completely new entity. For example, ape to man. Apes and men do have some similarities but they are clearly not the same species. And for that matter if they did evolve into humans why are apes still here?
The Theory of Evolution just opens up more questions.
---
~*~Positive Mental Attitude Advocate~*~
|
|
2/16/2008, 8:25 am
|
Send Email to Moriah Cosmos
Send PM to Moriah Cosmos
|
Staybrite
Administrator
Global user
Registered: 07-2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1699
Karma: 70 (+70/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation vs Evolution - A Scientific Perspective
I would have to concede that micro evolution does happen. Our species (man not ape) has been getting taller for the last 800 years. Just one piece of eveidence to support micro evolution.
That however gives no proof that macro evolutions occurs (one species changing into another). Evolutionist say that Christians are relying on faith alone in God as the creator, but I think it takes more faith to be an evolutionist than it does to be a Christian.
BTW welcome to the board Dan and Moriah.
---
Peace, that brief period in history when everyone stops to reload.
|
|
2/16/2008, 11:42 am
|
Send Email to Staybrite
Send PM to Staybrite
|
Moriah Cosmos
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 02-2008
Posts: 62
Karma: 5 (+5/-0)
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Creation vs Evolution - A Scientific Perspective
thanks for the warm welcome!! 
---
~*~Positive Mental Attitude Advocate~*~
|
|
2/23/2008, 4:26 pm
|
Send Email to Moriah Cosmos
Send PM to Moriah Cosmos
|
Add a reply
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 9/7/2008, 10:12 pm
|
|
|
sorry to ramble 
anyone the person I talkto in the morning must not be up yet their lazy butt is still in bed 
