Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Fitzgerald Fortune
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Inside the Red Circle
Posts: 792
Karma: 12 (+12/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
I'm glad that SCREEN WIPE is back on television!
I never liked SHAMELESS. To me, it seemed like a load of gutter-level posturing concocted by media types over their morning frappa-lappa-vanilla bullGrit things. I couldn't find the series funny, because I grew up knowing people like the characters in that show; and although they may appear to be amusing to an outsider, when you have to deal with them on a daily basis they are far less entertaining and can be quite threatening. I couldn't detach myself from what to my mind was a bad, patronising class-based joke that was being made by people who live in the ivory tower of TV Land.
I found the show's message enormously offensive. The show seemed to suggest that the Gallaghers were representative of the working class, working against a common class enemy: the middle class, whose interests are protected by the police. What the show failed to deal with was the mayhem that people like the Gallaghers cause for honest working class people, who very often aren't protected by the police and who tend to have to live in very close proximity to people like the Gallaghers. Those people are the forgotten victims of this class war, and by romanticising the Gallaghers SHAMELESS spat in the face of every working class victim of people like the Gallaghers.
It's all very well for television producers and journos to praise the show's 'ASBO chic', but you see a very different side of the coin when a kid who looks like one of the characters from SHAMELESS is shoving dog crap through your letterbox or kicking your neighbour's cat; and you know that if you report a crime the police will take one look at your post code and decide that as you live amongst the yobbos, instead of sending a police officer round, they will instead give you a crime number. (My recent run-in with the law opened my eyes to just how differently the supposed 'middle class' are treated by the police: when I told the operator where I lived, she seemed quite blase about the incident, but when I told her I taught at the college, all of a sudden she became quite polite and the gears were set in motion much more quickly.)
Last edited by Fitzgerald Fortune, 9/30/2007, 11:37 pm
--- 'Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy'.

|
|
9/30/2007, 11:18 pm
|
Send Email to Fitzgerald Fortune
Send PM to Fitzgerald Fortune
|
Fitzgerald Fortune
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Inside the Red Circle
Posts: 792
Karma: 12 (+12/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
I liked Jimmy McGovern's denouncement of SHAMELESS, by the way. (I like McGovern's work immensely.)
From THE GUARDIAN:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1859384,00.html
Cracker creator blasts 'chav' TV
Studio bosses 'ridicule white working classes'
Lorna Martin, Scotland editor
Sunday August 27, 2006
Observer
One of Britain's most celebrated screenwriters has launched a blistering attack on the makers of so-called trash TV, accusing them of exploiting the white, working classes for their own amusement and entertainment.
Jimmy McGovern, who created Cracker and acclaimed dramas including Hillsborough, condemned 'latte-drinking, pesto-eating middle-class' TV executives, saying their treatment of Britain's working classes was not only patronising and offensive but also potentially dangerous. At a debate titled Chav TV at the Edinburgh Television Festival, panellists discussed whether the white working class was the only group left that it was acceptable to ridicule openly.
Reality television shows such as Wife Swap, Big Brother and the confessional Jeremy Kyle Show, which tend to rely on working-class participants in search of fame or fortune, were the focus of most criticism. But the portrayal of the working classes in comedy programmes such as Little Britain and dramas like Shameless were also debated.
McGovern accused industry executives of treating their audience with contempt: 'Normally, they would look to people on the left to speak up for them, but they haven't. Because they're not sexy. Unlike black lesbians, white, working-class men aren't sexy. So they are either ignored or patronised.
'I am delighted to see the state ITV are in. It is simply because they have utter contempt for their audience. These executives don't sit around and say, what kind of intelligent, informative, thought-provoking programmes would we like to watch? They think, what will the ignorant plebs that watch our channel want to see? They have total contempt for their audience, which is largely working class.' His comments come after Charles Allen, ITV's chief executive, who will step down in October, defended his much-criticised tenure at Britain's biggest commercial broadcaster. Speaking at the prestigious MacTaggart Lecture, Allen, who was ousted following investor dismay at ITV's flagging share price, admitted that some of ITV's problems were 'self-inflicted'.
However, he said the channel would only thrive if his successor sorted out 'the public service broadcasting hand tied behind our back and the CRR [the Contract Rights Renewal system, which limits the amount ITV1 can charge advertisers] gun to our head'.
At yesterday's debate, the key focus was on whether TV executives and programme makers were exploiting the working classes. A YouGov survey released at the event showed that most people in the television industry think that Vicky Pollard, the teenage delinquent happy to swap her baby for a Westlife CD, is an accurate representation of the white working class in Britain.
The study found that 70 per cent of industry representatives thought the Little Britain character who smokes, drinks and struggles to string a sentence together was a fairly typical reflection of the youth of today. However, the poll also showed that 40 per cent of viewers found the portrayal of the tracksuited teenager offensive.
Michael Collins, writer and presenter of Channel 4's Working Class, actor Sally Lindsay and freelance journalist and broadcaster Sarfraz Manzoor were also on the panel, chaired by writer and broadcaster Mark Lawson.
'There is something about a working-class person,' McGovern said. 'They are normally very welcoming. They will show people hospitality and lots of it. Working-class people will talk and perform not because they are stupid, but because they don't want to make someone feel awkward.'
Lindsay, who played Shelley in Coronation Street, said a large part of the problem was caused by middle-class scriptwriters: 'You have to have lived a working-class life to know what working-class people say. Contrary to what some middle-class TV executives and scriptwriters think, northerners don't go around saying "Eeh by gum"."
However, she said she found Vicky Pollard hilarious, adding that it was important to remember that it tended to be middle-class, politically correct people who expressed outrage about such issues. 'Vicky Pollard is a caricature. It is comedy, and in the same way that when John Reid made his comment about smoking being one of the few luxuries working-class people enjoyed, it was the politically correct left-wing liberal middle classes who expressed outrage.'
--- 'Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy'.

|
|
9/30/2007, 11:39 pm
|
Send Email to Fitzgerald Fortune
Send PM to Fitzgerald Fortune
|
Djjaines
Lovable Rogue Writer
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Location: In me own head.
Posts: 672
Karma: 8 (+8/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
I was going to make a comment but I can't decide whether I agree or disagree, mainly because some of my mates are and some aren't how tv represents them.
--- Daniel: Master of malapropisms and Danisms.
Danism: Using stupid sounding or vague descriptions to put what may be an intellectual point across.
Beatrice: You really put the "W" in anchorman don't you?
|
|
10/1/2007, 6:58 pm
|
Send Email to Djjaines
Send PM to Djjaines
AIM
MSN
|
Edge44
3rd year Batmanian
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1095
Karma: 5 (+6/-1)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
quote: Fitzgerald Fortune wrote:
I'm glad that SCREEN WIPE is back on television!
I never liked SHAMELESS. To me, it seemed like a load of gutter-level posturing concocted by media types over their morning frappa-lappa-vanilla bullGrit things. I couldn't find the series funny, because I grew up knowing people like the characters in that show; and although they may appear to be amusing to an outsider, when you have to deal with them on a daily basis they are far less entertaining and can be quite threatening. I couldn't detach myself from what to my mind was a bad, patronising class-based joke that was being made by people who live in the ivory tower of TV Land.
I found the show's message enormously offensive. The show seemed to suggest that the Gallaghers were representative of the working class, working against a common class enemy: the middle class, whose interests are protected by the police. What the show failed to deal with was the mayhem that people like the Gallaghers cause for honest working class people, who very often aren't protected by the police and who tend to have to live in very close proximity to people like the Gallaghers. Those people are the forgotten victims of this class war, and by romanticising the Gallaghers SHAMELESS spat in the face of every working class victim of people like the Gallaghers.
It's all very well for television producers and journos to praise the show's 'ASBO chic', but you see a very different side of the coin when a kid who looks like one of the characters from SHAMELESS is shoving dog crap through your letterbox or kicking your neighbour's cat; and you know that if you report a crime the police will take one look at your post code and decide that as you live amongst the yobbos, instead of sending a police officer round, they will instead give you a crime number. (My recent run-in with the law opened my eyes to just how differently the supposed 'middle class' are treated by the police: when I told the operator where I lived, she seemed quite blase about the incident, but when I told her I taught at the college, all of a sudden she became quite polite and the gears were set in motion much more quickly.)
Your passion oozes through every word, and I agree wholeheartedly. I bought into the first season of SHAMELESS, thinking it was very funny, but then the second season continued the same old model and jokes until, inevitably, it forced me to question just exactly what it was the creators were actually saying?'
I too was brought up in an environment similar to SHAMELESS and you're right - it's definitely not funny.
--- "Everything's relative..."
|
|
10/1/2007, 10:46 pm
|
Send Email to Edge44
Send PM to Edge44
|
Djjaines
Lovable Rogue Writer
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Location: In me own head.
Posts: 672
Karma: 8 (+8/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
Skins is similar but different, it's a provides a very interesting tangent on the types of teen it presents, especially the gay teen maxxie who isn't the flaunty shimmering gay, but a representation of some of the quieter ones. It isn't just a comedy, it has it's very very very dark moments within it and is very believable at times. In it's characturish players it portrays the darker side and the lighter side o teen life.
--- Daniel: Master of malapropisms and Danisms.
Danism: Using stupid sounding or vague descriptions to put what may be an intellectual point across.
Beatrice: You really put the "W" in anchorman don't you?
|
|
10/1/2007, 11:23 pm
|
Send Email to Djjaines
Send PM to Djjaines
AIM
MSN
|
Fitzgerald Fortune
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Inside the Red Circle
Posts: 792
Karma: 12 (+12/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
quote: Edge44 wrote:
quote: Fitzgerald Fortune wrote:
I'm glad that SCREEN WIPE is back on television!
I never liked SHAMELESS. To me, it seemed like a load of gutter-level posturing concocted by media types over their morning frappa-lappa-vanilla bullGrit things. I couldn't find the series funny, because I grew up knowing people like the characters in that show; and although they may appear to be amusing to an outsider, when you have to deal with them on a daily basis they are far less entertaining and can be quite threatening. I couldn't detach myself from what to my mind was a bad, patronising class-based joke that was being made by people who live in the ivory tower of TV Land.
I found the show's message enormously offensive. The show seemed to suggest that the Gallaghers were representative of the working class, working against a common class enemy: the middle class, whose interests are protected by the police. What the show failed to deal with was the mayhem that people like the Gallaghers cause for honest working class people, who very often aren't protected by the police and who tend to have to live in very close proximity to people like the Gallaghers. Those people are the forgotten victims of this class war, and by romanticising the Gallaghers SHAMELESS spat in the face of every working class victim of people like the Gallaghers.
It's all very well for television producers and journos to praise the show's 'ASBO chic', but you see a very different side of the coin when a kid who looks like one of the characters from SHAMELESS is shoving dog crap through your letterbox or kicking your neighbour's cat; and you know that if you report a crime the police will take one look at your post code and decide that as you live amongst the yobbos, instead of sending a police officer round, they will instead give you a crime number. (My recent run-in with the law opened my eyes to just how differently the supposed 'middle class' are treated by the police: when I told the operator where I lived, she seemed quite blase about the incident, but when I told her I taught at the college, all of a sudden she became quite polite and the gears were set in motion much more quickly.)
Your passion oozes through every word, and I agree wholeheartedly. I bought into the first season of SHAMELESS, thinking it was very funny, but then the second season continued the same old model and jokes until, inevitably, it forced me to question just exactly what it was the creators were actually saying?'
I too was brought up in an environment similar to SHAMELESS and you're right - it's definitely not funny.
I think SHAMELESS' initial originality blindsided a number of people, and this accounts for quite a lot of the praise it attracted; but once its sheen of 'newness' wore off, at least for me it became apparent that the show was trading on stereotypes and generalisations, and was romanticising behaviour that in reality causes pain and upset for a huge chunk of the population.
I never saw SKINS; the fact that it was sold as being the new show from the creators of SHAMELESS immediately put me off.
--- 'Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy'.

|
|
10/2/2007, 7:27 pm
|
Send Email to Fitzgerald Fortune
Send PM to Fitzgerald Fortune
|
Fitzgerald Fortune
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Inside the Red Circle
Posts: 792
Karma: 12 (+12/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
Doubled.
Last edited by Fitzgerald Fortune, 10/2/2007, 7:29 pm
--- 'Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy'.

|
|
10/2/2007, 7:28 pm
|
Send Email to Fitzgerald Fortune
Send PM to Fitzgerald Fortune
|
Fitzgerald Fortune
Registered user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Inside the Red Circle
Posts: 792
Karma: 12 (+12/-0)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
MASTERS OF HORROR, Series 2: 'The Black Cat'. A superb piece of metafiction from Stuart Gordon, the director of FROM BEYOND, DAGON and RE-ANIMATOR, with Jeffrey Combs playing Edgar Allan Poe. Possibly the best episode I've seen from the MASTERS OF HORROR series.
Some clips here .
--- 'Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy'.

|
|
10/20/2007, 1:29 pm
|
Send Email to Fitzgerald Fortune
Send PM to Fitzgerald Fortune
|
NovelNymph
Fiesty Flamehaired Female
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Location: ink stained, paper strewn desk
Posts: 544
Karma: 26 (+27/-1)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
UGLY BETTY is back! Yay.
I'm watching the filthy Californication starring David Duchovny. I used to love him in X Files, now everybody loves him in this new series - literally.
Can I just say, best advert of the year goes to the Phil Collins, drumming Gorilla for Cadburys. Who thought it up? What does it have to do with chocolate? Who cares?
|
|
10/22/2007, 8:25 pm
|
Send Email to NovelNymph
Send PM to NovelNymph
|
Edge44
3rd year Batmanian
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1095
Karma: 5 (+6/-1)

|
|
|
|
Re: Track your television viewing 2007
quote: NovelNymph wrote:
UGLY BETTY is back! Yay.
I'm watching the filthy Californication starring David Duchovny. I used to love him in X Files, now everybody loves him in this new series - literally.
Can I just say, best advert of the year goes to the Phil Collins, drumming Gorilla for Cadburys. Who thought it up? What does it have to do with chocolate? Who cares?
It's great, isn't it...
--- "Everything's relative..."
|
|
10/22/2007, 10:32 pm
|
Send Email to Edge44
Send PM to Edge44
|
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 11/24/2009, 3:50 am
|
|
|