Project Roster ~ at Runboard.com

September 17th, 2007 This is an archive to preserve discussions regarding designs and reference material. You are welcome to browse the contents, but to join discussions regarding current projects, please visit us at our UPDATED FORUM

Star Wars Design Alliance
 Suggestions and Ideas
  Project Roster
Support
Search

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4 

 
AgentToon

Global user

Registered: 04-2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 135
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


Thank you, Lucas and Servo. It seemed a logical format, and is loosly based off project time sheets I used for one of the companies I contracted with.

Kenpo, Myka: Nice... Take a good look at mine, though. I actually linked the thread with my project, my user info to my name and my current progress to a couple images.

The devil is in the detail, and I think I'm slowly becoming well acquainted with ol' Scratch.

Last edited by AgentToon, 6/20/2006, 9:04 pm


---
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
- Douglas Adams

6/20/2006, 9:03 pm  
 
The VOID
Emperor's Hand
Global user

Registered: 03-2006
Location: European Union
Posts: 2372
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


quote:

Slay1 wrote:

Then you suggest a new project to add to the gallery, so I merely suggested the need to stay on track with the things already listed to do.



I still don't get your point. I suggested a new project to be added to the gallery? I don't recall suggesting any new projects. I suggested a new category for the gallery. The actual work tied to that would be... let me thing... yep. Making a button for it. If that counts as a new project, then it is a helluva 30 seconds project and I am afraid it won't delay anything at all. I never said I'd want to fill all the categories I suggested with content myself, did I? emoticon

Project: Nella 342
Primary Artist: VOID
Other Artists Currently Involved: None
Current Progress: detailed description
Project Status: done soon

Project: Nella 352 Courier/Escort
Primary Artist: VOID
Other Artists Currently Involved: None
Current Progress: fluff, general and detailed description
Project Status: done soon

Project: Nella 380 Explorer
Primary Artist: VOID
Other Artists Currently Involved: None
Current Progress: deckplaning 90% done
Project Status: done soon

Project: Czerka Yacht
Primary Artist: VOID
Other Artists Currently Involved: None
Current Progress: complete external rework
Project Status: temporarily halted

Project: Parts Collection & Compendium
Primary Artist: VOID
Other Artists Currently Involved: None
Current Progress: Compilation phase started
Project Status: progressing slowly, updates soon


By the way: I suggest to leave out the "Other Artists Currently Involved" part, unless other artists ARE involved. Otherwise we'd need a "Mint Flavoured Squirrels Killed During Progress: None" entry, too. emoticon

Of course, if we should decide to organise projects in a table, it is a valid entry. emoticon

Another thing: Sure, most of the time it will be hard to keep track of that in a usefull way, but perhaps a "Total Status: 0-100%" entry would be nice for visitors to get a rough impression on how far something is. Of course, that would only be a estimated number.

---
"The sand people are easily startled, but they will soon be back, and in greater numbers." — Obi-Wan Kenobi

Image
6/20/2006, 11:09 pm  
 
mykaDragonBlue
Imperial Tourist
Global user

Registered: 05-2006
Posts: 135
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


quote:

The VOID wrote:
Another thing: Sure, most of the time it will be hard to keep track of that in a usefull way, but perhaps a "Total Status: 0-100%" entry would be nice for visitors to get a rough impression on how far something is. Of course, that would only be a estimated number.



It would help to have some sort of standardised progress stages for that to work well (research, planning, base design, detail externals... etcetera)

Actually a general set of progresses wouldnt hurt in any case.

The project roster needs to be based on some pretty general status groups or Lucas is going to be spending all his time updating from "Project Status: developing engine superstructure" to "Project Status: detailing engine componentry" and so-on.



---
[- i have no sig -]
6/20/2006, 11:54 pm  
 
Lucas P
Emperor
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3362
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


good points Void and Myka.

Stages of progress, I think would be as follows

0 - 19%: Orthographic construction
20 - 39%: Exterior detailing
40 - 59%: Interior construction
60 - 79%: interior detailing
80 - 99%: Compiling Statistics
100%: complete

I think that works well, and it's not that hard to track progress with this structure.

Thank you very much to those of you who have started to post your info so far. emoticon

kind regards,
Lucas

---
Only 2 things are infinite; The Universe, and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Image
6/21/2006, 8:00 am  
 
AgentToon

Global user

Registered: 04-2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 135
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


Very nice, Lucas.

The only problem with that that I can see is that, as I 3D Model the Aramand Patrol Cruiser, I'll almost definately go out of that order. Thus I can see some cases where the Exterior Detailing and Interior Construction phases would be juxtaposed or even run concurrently, depending upon what material currently exists.

---
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
- Douglas Adams

6/21/2006, 10:00 am  
 
mykaDragonBlue
Imperial Tourist
Global user

Registered: 05-2006
Posts: 135
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


very true AgentToon, the scale doesnt neseccarily represent the relative time for each stage either.

But i think thats irellevant. You should always be able to chose the 'best' stage to represent what you're doing, and people will then know what to expect when they see the work your doing.

Also, this scale is a good representation of what comments are usfull at any point.

In general, this is a broad representation of the phases of ship construction. they may not always hold, but theyre a good guide.

---
[- i have no sig -]
6/21/2006, 10:08 am  
 
tpkc klick
Kuati Merchant Prince
Global user

Registered: 12-2005
Location: Binghamton, New York
Posts: 565
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


I do things concurrantly as well, so I've assigned each step 20% of the total completion and added the various percentages together to get my results.

Project: K.D.Y. Corona-class Light Transport
Primary Artist: Klick
Other Artists Currently Involved: (Would VOID be "currently involved" or not?)
Current Progress: Interior detailing continues
Project Status: 91% complete, work ongoing

Project: J.A.H. SP-G15 Sharisa-class gunship
Primary Artist: Klick
Current Progress: Revamping and expanding orthos
Project Status: 72% complete, work ongoing

Project: K.D.Y. A-9 Interceptor
Primary Artist: Klick
Current Progress: Orthos in development
Project Status: 5% complete (please contact primary artist if you want to pick up this project)

Project: C.E.C. PT-3300 modular gunship
Primary Artist: Klick
Current Progress: Deck 1 pending
Project Status: 50% complete, on hold (custom ship- reserved for primary artist)

Project: K.F.T./J.A.H. Mk.9 Series Yacht
Primary Artist: Klick
Current Progress: Revamping and expanding orthos
Project Status: 73% complete, on hold (custom ship- reserved for primary artist)

Project: Coruscani Shipwrights Davira-class heavy transport.
Primary Artist: Klick
Current Progress: Creating orthos
Project Status: 41% complete, on hold (custom ship- reserved for primary artist)



---
wow, flood, heat wave, tornado...holy **** Mike, time to move, don't you think? -Lucas P
6/21/2006, 10:18 am  
 
Tiree
Emperor's Hand
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: Edge of Insanity
Posts: 262
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


How about having four or five different categories and you show completion in each category:

Orthographic construction 0-100%
Exterior detailing 0-100%
Interior construction 0-100%
interior detailing 0-100%
Compiling Statistics 0-100%

Because in each instance changes can be made - but once you have settled on something call it 100% or 90% and move on. When it is ready to put up to the website slap 100% across the board.
6/21/2006, 11:09 am  
 
mykaDragonBlue
Imperial Tourist
Global user

Registered: 05-2006
Posts: 135
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


that would also work very well.

regarding presentation of the progres status, i'd suggest using a progress bar (or a few of them) for easy display of the percentage. they're easy to do.

---
[- i have no sig -]
6/21/2006, 11:42 am  
 
Lucas P
Emperor
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3362
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: Project Roster


I really like my solution.

It is true that people tend to start the orthos and then work on other items within the drawing collectively. However, those percentage indicators are there to show a general completion. I do not like just arbvitrarily creating a 71% or 42% number on a drawing where it cannot be determined what that even means. Thgerefore the guidelines I indicated are more accurate to give the average person an understanding of what parts are in development.

Adding in a little disclaimer like;

0 - 19%: Orthographic construction - complete
20 - 39%: Exterior detailing - in progress
40 - 59%: Interior construction - in progress
60 - 79%: interior detailing
80 - 99%: Compiling Statistics - in progress

this makes more sense to the layman and indicates that parallel development is being done.

regards,
Lucas


---
Only 2 things are infinite; The Universe, and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Image
6/21/2006, 11:49 am  
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/24/2009, 10:57 am
Unique Visitors Since March 23rd 2006 at 23:00 Pacific Standard Time
site stats
Estimated Pageloads Since October 2nd 2005
Web Counters

RunSearch


STAR WARS™ © ® and everything intellectually, written, or graphically related to it, is wholly the property of Lucasfilm Ltd. and its creator, George Lucas. STAR WARS The Roleplaying Game is currently licensed to Wizards of the Coast, and was formerly under the care of WEST END GAMES. Used in accordance with fair use of copyright material under U.S. Title Code 17, section 107.
All of the ships contained herein are based on existing ships in the SWRPG, books, or movies. We do not claim any rights or credit to these ships, only to our drawings and deckplans, which are based on them. The internal systems in these ships are inspired by the style pioneered by Frank V. Bonura, Brandon Koller, Mike Marincic, Robert Brown, the Star Wars Deckplans Alliance forum community and the Star Wars Design Alliance forum community. The ships themselves are copyrighted to the original artists.