TIE series ~ at Runboard.com

September 17th, 2007 This is an archive to preserve discussions regarding designs and reference material. You are welcome to browse the contents, but to join discussions regarding current projects, please visit us at our UPDATED FORUM

Star Wars Design Alliance
 Technical Discussions
  TIE series
Support
Search

runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6 

 
psCargile
Banned user
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Posts: 1268
Reply | Quote
The World of Star Wars pub


Frank, you always say go to the earliest source. Is 1981 early enough?

Hope so.

Image
The cover.

Image
Falcon had front loading freight arms. Bloackade Runner had fuel-burning engines.

Image
Humm, now if everything had ions engines, this statement about the TIE wouldn't be necessary.

Image
Again, ion engines better than ordinary rocket powered craft.

This tells me that the TIE use of ion engines was exclusive to other types of capital and fighter craft. How did the ion engine lable get carried to almost all others?



Last edited by Lucas P, 9/17/2006, 3:49 pm
11/11/2005, 12:54 am  
 
Boomer Tiro
Imperial Tourist
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Posts: 203
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


It happened just a few years BEFORE that publication on the description of the 1979 Star Wars toy vessels by Kenner.

It's crap like that which caused George Lucas to finally say "Wait, I need to read and approve all of this stuff myself before I let anything go, for continuity sake..."

...and than he goes crazy and senile just before making the prequels... ruined everything.
11/12/2005, 12:01 am  
 
Lucas P
Emperor
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3362
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


excuse me? continuity of the model descriptions? GL approves the descriptions?

Where did you get that idea? Not only are the descriptions mostly in conflict with each other, but most of the time, the designs don't even match up. GL does not spend all his days talking to every star wars artist saying "that's the right design for a 200 year old Swoop bike", or "that Action VI transport needs nipples."

he does not bother. he just agrees to let publications occur if he gets a royalty on the usage of his product name.

[jive translation mode on] golly! [jive translation mode off]

---
Only 2 things are infinite; The Universe, and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Image
11/12/2005, 12:48 pm  
 
Boomer Tiro
Imperial Tourist
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Posts: 203
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


Wow, taking a joke seriously, and adding words I did not say.
11/12/2005, 12:52 pm  
 
Lucas P
Emperor
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3362
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


quote:

Boomer Tiro wrote:

Wow, taking a joke seriously,



There was a joke there?

quote:

and adding words I did not say


Ah, the beauty of the english language, I don't have to use your exact words to make my point.

perhaps the following response suits your taste.

quote:

It's crap like that which caused George Lucas to finally say "Wait, I need to read and approve all of this stuff myself before I let anything go, for continuity sake..."



That's a joke right?

quote:

... ruined everything.



or is that one?

\Some people just don't get it.

---
Only 2 things are infinite; The Universe, and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Image
11/12/2005, 1:58 pm  
 
FVBonura
Banned user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 1754
Reply | Quote
posticon CHAOS RAMPANT!!! - My head hurts


Very interesting Paul. If That article holds up, it essentially contradicts almost everything. I had that book but it was in worse shape than yours and was discarded in the early 80's. Preservation protocols were not as strict as they are today.

Shane Johnson seems to have contradicted that article in less than a year, in 1982 with his “Selayana-class Starship” blueprints of the Millennium Falcon simply called “Corellian Freighter”. On sheet 2 of 4 he states the propulsion system is a “Shass Mark VII antigrav cluster w/ Type 322 TI-HO HFG”. The propulsion type is listed as “Antigrav”. Oh the joy of this endless chaos. Will it ever make sense?

Later on, It would seem WEG ignored both these sources in 1987 with the production of the first edition RPG. Its hard to place blame for this when license holders pay very little attention to one another and in as many minds have conceived the EU, there are so many models of SW reality. Few agree with one another. My kingdom for consistency!!!

We know Somehow ion drives became the standard, and the LFL licensees embraced the idea completely. The above article does state the TIE is faster and more maneuverable than standard rocket powered craft. This did translate to the RPG with 4D maneuverability and space 10 (100 MGLT) speed.

Paul I am going to need the publisher and the names of the people who wrote that book please, and we will have to determine if its secondary or tertiary evidence. I am curious how much weight the publication deserves. Even in the light of this ancient source, the term “Twin Ion Engine” is clearly intended to be something exceptional in the SWU. I also still think the “E” in TIE denotes a single engine, and “Twin Ion” describes said engine. I also think this is the reason why TIEs are exemplary performance spacecraft. emoticon

---
Frank V Bonura - SWDA Founder - http://deckplans.00sf.com “For thou hast girded me with strength unto the battle: thou hast subdued under me those that rose up against me. ” - Psalm 18:39
11/12/2005, 2:27 pm  
 
psCargile
Banned user
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Posts: 1268
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


Image

TM: LUCASFILM LTD. (LFL) 1981 (copyright)LUCASFILM LTD. (LFL) 1981. Published in U.S.A. by Paradise Press, Inc. Packaged by Bunch Assoc. Ltd. First published 1981 Printed in the U.S.A.

Different people wrote the articles. Jon Trux wrote the article to which the Fact Files were sidebarred. No author is given for the TIE block.

I have The STAR WARS Compendium, issue 3, summer 1982 that has the below article on hyperspace, by John Chesterman.

Does Shane contradict this?

Image


Image



Last edited by Lucas P, 9/17/2006, 3:49 pm
11/12/2005, 7:05 pm  
 
FVBonura
Banned user
Global user

Registered: 10-2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 1754
Reply | Quote
posticon Strap yourselves in...


"so he began the countdown which would project them into another dimension."

WOW my theories agree with. I agree Hyperspace another dimension. I have some cultures in my campaign refer to it as "the Ether". I also populate the dimension with force sensitive creatures that can withstand the vacuum of space and utilize the dimension for mental travel disciplines using the force. These creatures are very rare in my campaign, but they are there.

I think this article should start a different thread. Hyperspace and TIE fighters are not always in the same sentence. emoticon

---
Frank V Bonura - SWDA Founder - http://deckplans.00sf.com “For thou hast girded me with strength unto the battle: thou hast subdued under me those that rose up against me. ” - Psalm 18:39
11/12/2005, 7:20 pm  
 
Lucas P
Emperor
Global user

Registered: 09-2005
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 3362
Avatar
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


bump

---
Only 2 things are infinite; The Universe, and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the former. - Albert Einstein

Image
4/14/2006, 9:44 am  
 
AgentToon

Global user

Registered: 04-2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 135
Reply | Quote
Re: TIE series


quote:

Lucas P wrote:
Why is Vader's ship a TIE, his has FOUR engines...shouldn't it be a QIE?



Who says it has four engines? Sure, you see four thrust nozzles, but that just means it's likely more maneuverable than a standard TIE, not that each nozzle is attached to an independent engine. After all, look at the AV-8B Harrier II in today's world. It has 4 nozzles and 2 air intakes. How many engines does it have? One.

My take on the TIE fighters, with their ****pit/engine/pylon/panel arrangement has always tended to picture them with an engine in each wing pylon, the wing panels as large radiators for those engines, and each pylon engine feeding the adjacent thrust nozzle.

In Vader's personal fighter, I've always pictured a somewhat larger engine within each of the pylons, with the output from each engine feeding a pair of nozzles, one above and one below the aft equipment plane. While this split is necessitated by the presence of the hyperdrive and shield generators present within the aft housing, it would also increase the craft's maneuverability through the ability to vary the amount of thrust feeding each nozzle more than in the standard TIE's two-nozzle arrangement.

---
I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.
- Douglas Adams

5/14/2006, 11:44 am  
 


Add a reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6 






Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b  -  Link to us   -  Blogs   -  Hall of Honour   -  Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
You are not logged in (login)      Board's time is: 11/24/2009, 12:46 pm
Unique Visitors Since March 23rd 2006 at 23:00 Pacific Standard Time
site stats
Estimated Pageloads Since October 2nd 2005
Web Counters

RunSearch


STAR WARS™ © ® and everything intellectually, written, or graphically related to it, is wholly the property of Lucasfilm Ltd. and its creator, George Lucas. STAR WARS The Roleplaying Game is currently licensed to Wizards of the Coast, and was formerly under the care of WEST END GAMES. Used in accordance with fair use of copyright material under U.S. Title Code 17, section 107.
All of the ships contained herein are based on existing ships in the SWRPG, books, or movies. We do not claim any rights or credit to these ships, only to our drawings and deckplans, which are based on them. The internal systems in these ships are inspired by the style pioneered by Frank V. Bonura, Brandon Koller, Mike Marincic, Robert Brown, the Star Wars Deckplans Alliance forum community and the Star Wars Design Alliance forum community. The ships themselves are copyrighted to the original artists.