Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Grtak
Grtak's titleless title
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Michigan,USA
Posts: 1053

|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
ok, which one of those sources is the oldest?
and does all of the added in equipment from the Lady Sunfire add up to more than the 15MT difference between the "Thrawn Trilogy Sourcebook" and "Pirates and Privateers"?
--- "You can call me GR" -GRtak
If people read this, they would not use more than two letters when addressing me.
|
|
12/6/2005, 9:50 am
|
|
FVBonura
Banned user
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 1754
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
"The Last Command Sourcebook" is the oldest known reference, and its first edition.
OK lets do a take off of the equipment:
gunnery station +100 kg
Class 1 hyperdrive +3 mt
Class 8 backup Hyperdrive +1 mt
Space 6 sublight engines +1 mt
+2 to hull armor +3 mt
Focus array +1D to focus scan +2 mt
Electronic Countermeasures Package +100kg
Stock laser cannon delette -2 mt
3 quad turbolaser batteries +12 mt
4 fire linked concussion Missile Launchers +16 mt
TOTAL: 36.2 MT in mods
36.2 mt + 70 mt = 106.2 mt of cargo lift total.
Well it seems 120 mt is closer than 85 mt, and my estimate is very conservative. With a more liberal estimate, we could go over 120 mt. Very interesting. Shall we take an unofficial poll? I think WEG may have corrected "Priates and Privateers", in "Stock Ships".
What do you think?
Last edited by FVBonura, 12/6/2005, 11:28 am
--- Frank V Bonura - SWDA Founder - http://deckplans.00sf.com “For thou hast girded me with strength unto the battle: thou hast subdued under me those that rose up against me. ” - Psalm 18:39
|
|
12/6/2005, 11:26 am
|
|
Grtak
Grtak's titleless title
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Michigan,USA
Posts: 1053

|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
120 metric tons is my vote
--- "You can call me GR" -GRtak
If people read this, they would not use more than two letters when addressing me.
|
|
12/6/2005, 11:28 am
|
|
Sathen
Imperial Tourist
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Posts: 28
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
Since it is stated that it used to be a medium freighter in its day I would say go for the 120 mark.
|
|
12/6/2005, 12:17 pm
|
|
Hothy
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Posts: 74
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
I'd also say 120, just seems to fit better.
|
|
12/6/2005, 12:25 pm
|
|
psCargile
Banned user
Global user
Registered: 09-2005
Posts: 1268
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
You know me, I'm going ot go on with 120.
|
|
12/6/2005, 12:25 pm
|
|
miraborn
Global user
Registered: 11-2005
Posts: 17
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
My vote is also for 120 MT.
|
|
12/7/2005, 7:45 pm
|
|
Grtak
Grtak's titleless title
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Michigan,USA
Posts: 1053

|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
The cargo capacity of the Barloz is listed as 120 Metric Tons in Starships of the Galaxy
--- "You can call me GR" -GRtak
If people read this, they would not use more than two letters when addressing me.
|
|
12/11/2005, 6:25 pm
|
|
EXPLETIVE DELETED
Imperial Tourist
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Posts: 468
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
quote: Grtak wrote:
The cargo capacity of the Barloz is listed as 120 Metric Tons in Starships of the Galaxy
*whispers*
...but that's D20!!!
*looks around nervously*
--- "If we're all clones, how come I'm the only one with a sense of humor?"
-RC-1262 A.K.A. "Scorch" A.K.A. Delta-Six-Two, Star Wars: Republic Commando
|
|
12/11/2005, 7:41 pm
|
|
Grtak
Grtak's titleless title
Global user
Registered: 10-2005
Location: Michigan,USA
Posts: 1053

|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Barloz
Yes I know it is D20, I borrowed it from a freind. But both systems have similar stats for things like size of the ship and cargo capacity.
--- "You can call me GR" -GRtak
If people read this, they would not use more than two letters when addressing me.
|
|
12/11/2005, 7:54 pm
|
|
Add a reply
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Powered by AkBBS 0.9.5b - Link to us
- Blogs
- Hall of Honour
- Chat
Click here to get your own free message board
|
You are not logged in (login)
Board's time is: 11/23/2009, 3:26 pm
|
|
|